Are Christians Supposed To Have a Blind Faith?

Last Updated: July 3, 2023By Tags:

Faith. Use this word today, and it conjures up images of people walking around with their eyes closed, not knowing where they are going, or what is in front of them. In other words – blind. Just believe. We have been conditioned to think that faith and reason are polar opposites. And it doesn’t help that Christians are often portrayed this way in movies and television. Someone comes to them with a greatly reasoned question the Christian can’t handle. The Christian surrenders to the rationality of the questioner and says “Honey, sometimes you just gotta have faith.”

What The Culture Thinks We Mean By Faith

With the increase of science and technology, people are taught to only believe in things they can observe or prove. And, since we can’t make God show up with a scientific test, or we can’t recreate Jesus’ resurrection in a laboratory experiment, he must not exist, and the resurrection could not have happened. Atheist and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins describes faith this way in his book The God Delusion:

[faith is] persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence

To Richard Dawkins (and many others), faith is the opposite of reason. This plays out in one of my favorite Christmas movies of all time: A Miracle on 34th Street. Towards the end, when the little girl loses her “faith” that Kris Kringle is Santa Clause, her mother encourages her she needs to keep believing in Santa Clause because “Faith is believing in things when common sense tells you not to”. The girl – quite correctly – responds with a puzzled “huh?”. It’s almost as if we could substitute faith with “wishful thinking”.

Do we really live our lives this way, though? Do we withhold actions until we can prove through scientific tests that we will be successful? The answer, of course, is no. Being so dogmatic on having to prove everything would make us terribly unproductive. Think of it this way; when you sat in your chair, did you first inspect the joinery holding it together, or use some sort of force gauge to see if it would hold you before you sat down? No, you didn’t. You know what chairs are for, you know what they are supposed to do, so you sat in it and didn’t give it a second thought. I trust that the chair will hold me before I sit in it.

On a more personal level, when I am at work, and my wife and kids are home after school, I don’t feel the need to have some sort of video camera so I can keep an eye on her. Nor do I feel the need to call her constantly to make sure everything is OK. I have faith in her as a mother. Why? Because experience has taught me that she is an amazing and trustworthy mother to my kids. My faith in her isn’t something that I hold blindly just because. I have developed trust in her through our relationship.

What The Bible Means By Faith

This is all fine and good. But, our topic today is biblical faith. So, if we want to know how Christians are supposed to think about faith we need to look in the Bible. So, when the authors of the New Testament wrote about faith, did they have the same definition as Richard Dawkins and Ms. Walker?  Did they really mean we should just sit down, shut up, and believe with no reason other than “just because”? Did the New Testament authors tell us to not ask questions and resist rationality?

In the original Greek of the New Testament, the word used for faith is pistis. This word doesn’t mean “belief with no reason”; it means conviction of the truth; trust; faithfulness. When the New Testament was translated to Latin, the word used was fides, which means “trust”. All of these definitions imply some sort of relationship or experience with the party or thing in question. In other words you have reasons. You didn’t decide to have faith in someone/something “just because”. You have faith in that person or thing based on prior experience and a developed relationship.

This concept of belief based on reason is played out all through the Bible. When Moses is talking to God at the burning bush, he tells God that the people won’t believe what he has to say. Does God say “Moses, you go back there and tell them they just gotta believe”? No. He tells Moses to perform various signs as evidence that what he says is true.

Throughout His ministry in the Gospels, Jesus routinely performed miracles of healing, feeding the masses, controlling the weather and raising the dead. Each of these miracles served a specific purpose in affecting the specific subject – the blind man could now see, the lame man could now walk, the 5000 had something to eat, and Lazarus came back to life – but they also served a bigger purpose. They were evidence that Jesus was who He said He was. He didn’t just walk around, doling out wisdom and telling people “hey, I’m God in the flesh aaaaaaand… you just gotta believe me when I said it”. No! He performed miracles as proof that he was who He said He was. And the biggest proof of all was He returned from the dead! He told the apostles he was going to be captured, tortured and put to death. And then He would rise from the dead. And it wasn’t until the disciples saw this happen that they truly believed Jesus was who He said He was.

One of my favorite examples of Jesus providing evidence for His nature occurs when John the Baptist is in prison. Here is Jesus’ cousin, the man who had been proclaiming His arrival, and who had been baptizing people in Jesus’ name. He even baptized Jesus and witnessed God proclaim from the heavens “this is my Son with whom I am well pleased”. Jesus had called John the most holy man on earth. So, here is John, sitting in Herod’s dungeon. And he begins to have doubts. So, he sends some of his disciples off to ask Jesus “are you really the Messiah”. Now, if it was me, I would have looked at those guys and said “John should know better. He’s known me all my life and seen me do enough. You go tell that guy to chill out and just believe me”. Thankfully, Jesus didn’t handle it the same way I would have. Instead, He had John’s disciples watch as He made the lame walk, cured the blind, cured leprosy and raised people from the dead. Then He says “OK, go back and give your report to John on what you have witnessed.” In other words, He gave John’s disciples (and therefore John) evidence that He was the one John was looking for. He didn’t encourage John to have a blind faith.

Why Do Some Christians Have Blind Faith?

Now, don’t get me wrong; Christians with blind faith certainly do exist. I would say a great number of us think we can’t ask questions and we should “just believe’.  The idea that we should have a blind faith and not ask questions usually comes from an incorrect interpretation of two passages in the Gospels. The first is Matthew 18:2-4 when Jesus tells us that the greatest in Heaven are those who are like children. Now, this certainly didn’t mean “don’t ask questions”. Anyone with kids knows they ask A LOT of questions. Because they have a desire to know the world around them. The difference between children and adults in this particular passage is that children do so with humility and a joy to know. They are also excited when they receive gifts. And, Jesus was offering the greatest gift of all – eternal life. Adults, on the other hand, often bring pride, ambition, and arrogance into the equation. These things get in the way of us truly humbling ourselves before God. So, this passage is about being humble, joyful and in wonder of the gift we have been given, and not “don’t ask questions”.

The second passage that may encourage people not to ask questions is Jesus appearing to the apostles when Thomas was having doubts (John:24-29). After Jesus appears he tells Thomas “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” At first, this may look like Jesus is somewhat scolding Thomas for not believing in Him. But, it wasn’t Jesus that Thomas was doubting; it was the eyewitness testimony of the apostles. In fact the apostles didn’t believe the eyewitness testimony of the women either! It wasn’t until they saw the empty tomb for themselves, and He appeared to them that they believed! Jesus’ point becomes more clear as we read the last verses of John’s Gospel. John writes ”

30 Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; 31 but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name. (ESV)”

John spells out his purpose at the end of his gospel. He wrote down only a handful of the possible pieces of evidence that we would need to believe that Jesus is the Messiah so that we, too can be saved.

Blind Faith Is Unbiblical and Dangerous

As you can see, having a blind faith is unbiblical. Our faith is built on trust and evidence. It’s not just wishful thinking. Having a blind faith can also be very dangerous when it is used to abuse others by people of authority. We’ve talked about the need for discernment before. The Bible teaches over and over that we are to “test the spirits”; in other words, don’t just follow things without thinking them through. Christianity is not a world view that says there must be blind obedience. Scripture tells us over and over again that we need to know what it teaches so that we can discern the truth when something comes into question. We need to weigh the evidence and come to the truth.

“Faith is not belief in spite of the evidence, but belief in light of the evidence” -Sean McDowell, Is God Just a Human Invention?

Talking About Faith With Nonbelievers

Sometimes in our conversations with nonbelievers, we use language and terms that they don’t understand. Or they have an incorrect definition of. “Faith” has become one of those terms. Even secular people use it in conversation when they talk about things that aren’t even religious. And, when they use it they mean “wishful thinking”. Or “believing in spite of reason”. So, rather than waste too much effort on redefining faith, I would encourage you to start using words that portray what our faith is really supposed to be. Words like “trust” or “conviction. This is what we are supposed to have. I put my trust in Jesus because I have studied what he taught and I think he got it right on the way the world works. I have a strong conviction on various issues because I have seen the way God works in the world around us. Now, I could have used the word “faith” in those sentences, but using trust and conviction drives home that my beliefs stand on solid reasoning and evidence.

In the end, we should not be the kind of Christian who believes simply because they want or need it to be true. Leading a blind faith is dangerous and can lead you down the wrong roads or over a cliff. Blind faith isn’t taught in the Bible. Asking questions is a way to come to know God just as you would ask questions to come to know anyone else. No, the Bible does not encourage us to believe “just because”; it encourages us to trust in Jesus based on reason and evidence evidence, and come to a rational conclusion on the truth of Christianity.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

About the Author: David W. Gilmore

Dave Gilmore is the founder and editor-in-chief of Legati Christi. Over the past few years he has developed a passion for Christian Apologetics and theology, and enjoys talking to others about the Christian world view

news via inbox

Nulla turp dis cursus. Integer liberos  euismod pretium faucibua


  1. John M. Bauer July 3, 2019 at 7:00 pm - Reply

    You spent a lot of time describing faith as something rather like evidence-based trust. Christians don’t have faith in Jesus “just because,” you said, but on account of “prior experience and a developed relationship.” Then you list several New Testament examples of people whose faith in Jesus was connected to some tangible evidence that Jesus was who he claimed to be—miraculously feeding people, healing the blind, raising the dead and so forth, signs and wonders to confirm the testimony. Thomas didn’t believe the apostles and they didn’t believe the women, that is, “until they saw the empty tomb for themselves,” just as the women had, and Thomas saw Jesus himself and his scars. Then you reference John 20:30–31 wherein it says that these signs and wonders were recorded so that the reader may believe that Jesus is the Christ and have life in his name.

    That is all well and good, but there is a thorny problem in all of this.

    To begin with, that Bible passage is eye-witness testimony, sir. The next section discusses talking about faith with non-believers. I can tell you right now what a non-believer would say to all of this: “Like these other people in the Bible that you talked about, I likewise cannot believe on somebody’s say-so alone. Like them, I need to see for myself, in order to possess a faith borne on a confirming miracle like healing a paralytic.” This is the sort of response that your article virtually begs to receive, and I have to wonder why you crafted it this way. Surely it was not intentional—or was it? You said that we should “trust in Jesus based on reason and evidence,” but what sort of evidence are you talking about that ISN’T eye-witness testimony or AVOIDS confirmation bias? Whatever that may be, surely that ought to have been included in the article.

    • David W. Gilmore July 4, 2019 at 5:52 am - Reply

      HI John,

      Thanks for your comment. I would certainly agree that the Bible is eyewitness testimony -which is a type of evidence. I didn’t make that statement directly in the post it looks like. If I did, would that clarify anything or change your thoughts on the article?

      • John M. Bauer July 4, 2019 at 10:00 pm - Reply

        I don’t think that it would change my criticism if you stated clearly that the Bible is eye-witness testimony. Again, have a look at what you had said. What Thomas doubted was the eye-witness testimony of the apostles, and what the apostles doubted was the eye-witness testimony of the women. The takeaway seems to be that eye-witness testimony was insufficient. What allowed them to finally believe was the addition of empirical evidence—seeing the empty tomb, seeing Jesus and touching his scars. The non-believer would say, “Yes, exactly this. The eye-witness testimony that you’re handing me (i.e., the Bible) is not enough. Like those people, I also need the addition of empirical evidence”—that is, a confirming miracle (such as healing a paralytic). Unless I am missing something, it seems that you have painted yourself into a corner, handing the non-believer a counter-argument on a silver platter.

        • David W. Gilmore July 10, 2019 at 6:27 am - Reply

          I see what you are getting at. But, I’m not sure it follows that what I am saying in that section is empirical evidence is required for belief. Just because Thomas and the others didn’t believe the eyewitness testimony, and needed more direct physical evidence, doesn’t mean we are to take the same path to belief. In fact, you and I don’t have that luxury. We have to rely on the eyewitness testimony. Jesus almost goes as far as to say they were wrong for needing more than the eyewitness testimony. That should have been sufficient evidence.

  2. Gordon July 24, 2022 at 6:26 pm - Reply

    I have received eyewitness testimony from those who have been abducted by aliens. Should I begin to base my identity off their stories? Does Luke’s testimony push itself across the line between truth and historical fiction any more than the prophesies made by Joan of Arc and other non-Biblical supernatural events that would violate the sufficiency of Scripture?
    Would you believe your friends’ testimonies above others’ when they tell you how wonderful the Church of Scientology is, after not hearing from them for years?
    The church needs miracles to validate its claims, or at least a supernatural unity and holiness that infuriates and captivates all fake and non Christians, yet your churches don’t have the spiritual discernment to vet out the pedophiles and wife-beaters from your own clergy! Your fruits indict you of misprision of your own’s criminal behavior and negligence in fulfilling the command to heal the sick. Your holy Spirit, however, won’t convict you, and your Judge is too busy sending legitimately loving people to burn in hell forever because they picked the wrong religion, forcing God to not love them any more.

    • David W. Gilmore July 27, 2022 at 4:54 am - Reply

      Hi Gordon,

      This article isn’t about whether or not Christianity is true. I have many more articles regarding the evidence for Christianity on the site. Please feel free to read those and respond as well.

      You gave an example of hearing testimonies of people who have been abducted. I would say that whether or not you should trust the testimony of the individual should be based on how well you know them, what your prior experience is with them on being truthful and honest, and if any other external evidence corroborates their account. If you’re hearing the account of some random individual on the news, you shouldn’t trust them based solely on their account. BUT, if you know this person well, know they wouldn’t make up such a tale, and have seen other evidence that backs up the account, you should at least investigate a little further.

      This article actually encourages something I think you are getting at and that is believing something based on evidence. This is very important because, as you mentioned, one cannot simply go based on the personal experiences of others. You are quite right in pointing out that people can give testimonies that often conflict. Personal testimony/experience is often given as the reason people believe things to be true. This is how Muslims are asked to verify if the Quran is true and Mormons are asked if the writings of Joseph Smith are true (if they get a “burning in the bosom”). Christians do it too, of course. But, my point is that they shouldn’t. Testimonies alone should not convince one of what is true and what is not because vastly different worldviews have experiences they all think validates their worldview. This is why what is true can’t simply be based on personal experience.

      Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to leave me a comment

  3. Sam Chinchilla September 12, 2023 at 12:47 pm - Reply

    This passage was insightful because it goes to show that we don’t only believe by “faith” but faith by reason

Leave A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.